Image to Link vs UrlBae

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%1.0%
Uptime · 30d100%0.0%
P50 · ms2811158
P95 · ms9371158
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Image to Link vs UrlBae: common questions

Which is more reliable, Image to Link or UrlBae?

On our scheduled checks, Image to Link leads on measured uptime — Image to Link at 100% versus UrlBae at 1.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Image to Link or UrlBae?

Image to Link has the lower median latency in our checks — Image to Link responds in 281 ms versus UrlBae at 1158 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Image to Link and UrlBae need an API key?

Image to Link needs no key, while UrlBae requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Image to Link first.

Can I call Image to Link and UrlBae from the browser?

Only Image to Link is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. UrlBae needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Image to Link and UrlBae free for commercial use?

Image to Link has unclear commercial terms, and UrlBae has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.