Image to Link vs Scrapfly

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%98.3%
P50 · ms2811015
P95 · ms9374809
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Image to Link vs Scrapfly: common questions

Which is more reliable, Image to Link or Scrapfly?

On our scheduled checks, Image to Link leads on measured uptime — Image to Link at 100% versus Scrapfly at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Image to Link or Scrapfly?

Image to Link has the lower median latency in our checks — Image to Link responds in 281 ms versus Scrapfly at 1015 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Image to Link and Scrapfly need an API key?

Image to Link needs no key, while Scrapfly requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Image to Link first.

Can I call Image to Link and Scrapfly from the browser?

Only Image to Link is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Scrapfly needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Image to Link and Scrapfly free for commercial use?

Image to Link has unclear commercial terms, and Scrapfly has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.