Image to Link vs PurgoMalum

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%86.3%
Uptime · 30d100%85.0%
P50 · ms281423
P95 · ms9374833
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Image to Link vs PurgoMalum: common questions

Which is more reliable, Image to Link or PurgoMalum?

On our scheduled checks, Image to Link leads on measured uptime — Image to Link at 100% versus PurgoMalum at 86.3% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Image to Link or PurgoMalum?

Image to Link has the lower median latency in our checks — Image to Link responds in 281 ms versus PurgoMalum at 423 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Image to Link and PurgoMalum need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Image to Link is callable with no signup, and PurgoMalum is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Image to Link and PurgoMalum from the browser?

Yes — both Image to Link and PurgoMalum send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Image to Link and PurgoMalum free for commercial use?

Image to Link has unclear commercial terms, and PurgoMalum has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.