Image to Link vs ipify

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms281149
P95 · ms937354
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearyes
Data licenseUnverifiedn/a
Free tierFree — limits not publishedUnlimited
Rate limitUnpublishedNone
In directory since2026-07-052026-05-02
operationalpartialdownno data

Image to Link vs ipify: common questions

Which is more reliable, Image to Link or ipify?

On our scheduled checks, Image to Link leads on measured uptime — Image to Link at 100% versus ipify at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Image to Link or ipify?

ipify has the lower median latency in our checks — Image to Link responds in 281 ms versus ipify at 149 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Image to Link and ipify need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Image to Link is callable with no signup, and ipify is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Image to Link and ipify from the browser?

Yes — both Image to Link and ipify send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Image to Link and ipify free for commercial use?

Image to Link has unclear commercial terms, and ipify allows commercial use on its free tier. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.