Image to Link vs IPGeolocation

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms281259
P95 · ms937994
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — 1000 requests/day
Rate limitUnpublished1000 requests/day on free plan
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Image to Link vs IPGeolocation: common questions

Which is more reliable, Image to Link or IPGeolocation?

Both are neck-and-neck — Image to Link and IPGeolocation each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Image to Link or IPGeolocation?

IPGeolocation has the lower median latency in our checks — Image to Link responds in 281 ms versus IPGeolocation at 259 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Image to Link and IPGeolocation need an API key?

Image to Link needs no key, while IPGeolocation requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Image to Link first.

Can I call Image to Link and IPGeolocation from the browser?

Yes — both Image to Link and IPGeolocation send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Image to Link and IPGeolocation free for commercial use?

Image to Link has unclear commercial terms, and IPGeolocation has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.