Ignav Flight API vs StayingAPI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.44%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms483143
P95 · ms4600913
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-09-21
operationalpartialdownno data

Ignav Flight API vs StayingAPI: common questions

Which is more reliable, Ignav Flight API or StayingAPI?

On our scheduled checks, StayingAPI leads on measured uptime — Ignav Flight API at 99.44% versus StayingAPI at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Ignav Flight API or StayingAPI?

StayingAPI has the lower median latency in our checks — Ignav Flight API responds in 483 ms versus StayingAPI at 143 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Ignav Flight API and StayingAPI need an API key?

Ignav Flight API needs no key, while StayingAPI requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Ignav Flight API first.

Can I call Ignav Flight API and StayingAPI from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Ignav Flight API and StayingAPI from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Ignav Flight API and StayingAPI free for commercial use?

Ignav Flight API has unclear commercial terms, and StayingAPI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.