Ignav Flight API vs PostalPinCode

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%98.0%
Uptime · 30d98.3%98.3%
P50 · ms773912
P95 · ms46003724
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — no key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Ignav Flight API vs PostalPinCode: common questions

Which is more reliable, Ignav Flight API or PostalPinCode?

On our scheduled checks, Ignav Flight API leads on measured uptime — Ignav Flight API at 99.02% versus PostalPinCode at 98.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Ignav Flight API or PostalPinCode?

Ignav Flight API has the lower median latency in our checks — Ignav Flight API responds in 773 ms versus PostalPinCode at 912 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Ignav Flight API and PostalPinCode need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Ignav Flight API is callable with no signup, and PostalPinCode is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Ignav Flight API and PostalPinCode from the browser?

Only PostalPinCode is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Ignav Flight API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Ignav Flight API and PostalPinCode free for commercial use?

Ignav Flight API has unclear commercial terms, and PostalPinCode has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.