Ignav Flight API vs Metro Lisboa

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.44%99.44%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms483710
P95 · ms46002459
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Ignav Flight API vs Metro Lisboa: common questions

Which is more reliable, Ignav Flight API or Metro Lisboa?

Both are neck-and-neck — Ignav Flight API and Metro Lisboa each measure 99.44% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Ignav Flight API or Metro Lisboa?

Ignav Flight API has the lower median latency in our checks — Ignav Flight API responds in 483 ms versus Metro Lisboa at 710 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Ignav Flight API and Metro Lisboa need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Ignav Flight API is callable with no signup, and Metro Lisboa is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Ignav Flight API and Metro Lisboa from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Ignav Flight API and Metro Lisboa from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Ignav Flight API and Metro Lisboa free for commercial use?

Ignav Flight API has unclear commercial terms, and Metro Lisboa has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.