IFTTT vs ScreenshotOne.com

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms682340
P95 · ms1262843
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

IFTTT vs ScreenshotOne.com: common questions

Which is more reliable, IFTTT or ScreenshotOne.com?

On our scheduled checks, IFTTT leads on measured uptime — IFTTT at 100% versus ScreenshotOne.com at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, IFTTT or ScreenshotOne.com?

ScreenshotOne.com has the lower median latency in our checks — IFTTT responds in 682 ms versus ScreenshotOne.com at 340 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do IFTTT and ScreenshotOne.com need an API key?

IFTTT needs no key, while ScreenshotOne.com requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for IFTTT first.

Can I call IFTTT and ScreenshotOne.com from the browser?

Only ScreenshotOne.com is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. IFTTT needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are IFTTT and ScreenshotOne.com free for commercial use?

IFTTT has unclear commercial terms, and ScreenshotOne.com has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.