IFTTT vs Parkhaus Basel API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.44%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms344681
P95 · ms15694885
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

IFTTT vs Parkhaus Basel API: common questions

Which is more reliable, IFTTT or Parkhaus Basel API?

On our scheduled checks, IFTTT leads on measured uptime — IFTTT at 100% versus Parkhaus Basel API at 99.44% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, IFTTT or Parkhaus Basel API?

IFTTT has the lower median latency in our checks — IFTTT responds in 344 ms versus Parkhaus Basel API at 681 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do IFTTT and Parkhaus Basel API need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — IFTTT is callable with no signup, and Parkhaus Basel API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call IFTTT and Parkhaus Basel API from the browser?

Only Parkhaus Basel API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. IFTTT needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are IFTTT and Parkhaus Basel API free for commercial use?

IFTTT has unclear commercial terms, and Parkhaus Basel API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.