IFTTT vs ItsThisForThat

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms682242
P95 · ms1262555
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished (docs ask you not to hammer it)
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

IFTTT vs ItsThisForThat: common questions

Which is more reliable, IFTTT or ItsThisForThat?

Both are neck-and-neck — IFTTT and ItsThisForThat each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, IFTTT or ItsThisForThat?

ItsThisForThat has the lower median latency in our checks — IFTTT responds in 682 ms versus ItsThisForThat at 242 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do IFTTT and ItsThisForThat need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — IFTTT is callable with no signup, and ItsThisForThat is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call IFTTT and ItsThisForThat from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call IFTTT and ItsThisForThat from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are IFTTT and ItsThisForThat free for commercial use?

IFTTT has unclear commercial terms, and ItsThisForThat has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.