IFTTT vs IPLocate

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms68221
P95 · ms126282
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

IFTTT vs IPLocate: common questions

Which is more reliable, IFTTT or IPLocate?

Both are neck-and-neck — IFTTT and IPLocate each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, IFTTT or IPLocate?

IPLocate has the lower median latency in our checks — IFTTT responds in 682 ms versus IPLocate at 21 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do IFTTT and IPLocate need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — IFTTT is callable with no signup, and IPLocate is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call IFTTT and IPLocate from the browser?

Only IPLocate is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. IFTTT needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are IFTTT and IPLocate free for commercial use?

IFTTT has unclear commercial terms, and IPLocate has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.