IFTTT vs IPGeolocation

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms682259
P95 · ms1262994
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — 1000 requests/day
Rate limitUnpublished1000 requests/day on free plan
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

IFTTT vs IPGeolocation: common questions

Which is more reliable, IFTTT or IPGeolocation?

Both are neck-and-neck — IFTTT and IPGeolocation each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, IFTTT or IPGeolocation?

IPGeolocation has the lower median latency in our checks — IFTTT responds in 682 ms versus IPGeolocation at 259 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do IFTTT and IPGeolocation need an API key?

IFTTT needs no key, while IPGeolocation requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for IFTTT first.

Can I call IFTTT and IPGeolocation from the browser?

Only IPGeolocation is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. IFTTT needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are IFTTT and IPGeolocation free for commercial use?

IFTTT has unclear commercial terms, and IPGeolocation has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.