shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

IFTTT vs Image to Link

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIIFTTTNEW—Image to LinkNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

IFTTT vs Image to Link: common questions

Which is more reliable, IFTTT or Image to Link?

On our scheduled checks, Image to Link leads on measured uptime — IFTTT at —% versus Image to Link at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do IFTTT and Image to Link need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — IFTTT is callable with no signup, and Image to Link is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call IFTTT and Image to Link from the browser?

Only Image to Link is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. IFTTT needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are IFTTT and Image to Link free for commercial use?

IFTTT has unclear commercial terms, and Image to Link has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.