shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Icanhazip vs Zube

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIIcanhazipDEAD0ZubeDEAD0
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d0.0%0.0%
Uptime · 30d0.0%0.0%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Icanhazip vs Zube: common questions

Which is more reliable, Icanhazip or Zube?

Both are neck-and-neck — Icanhazip and Zube each measure 0.0% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Do Icanhazip and Zube need an API key?

Icanhazip needs no key, while Zube requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Icanhazip first.

Can I call Icanhazip and Zube from the browser?

Only Icanhazip is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Zube needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Icanhazip and Zube free for commercial use?

Icanhazip has unclear commercial terms, and Zube has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.