Icanhazip vs US Autocomplete
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Icanhazip vs US Autocomplete: common questions
Which is more reliable, Icanhazip or US Autocomplete?
On our scheduled checks, US Autocomplete leads on measured uptime — Icanhazip at 26.5% versus US Autocomplete at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Icanhazip or US Autocomplete?
Icanhazip has the lower median latency in our checks — Icanhazip responds in 328 ms versus US Autocomplete at 683 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Icanhazip and US Autocomplete need an API key?
Icanhazip needs no key, while US Autocomplete requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Icanhazip first.
Can I call Icanhazip and US Autocomplete from the browser?
Yes — both Icanhazip and US Autocomplete send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are Icanhazip and US Autocomplete free for commercial use?
Icanhazip has unclear commercial terms, and US Autocomplete has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.