Icanhazip vs RSQ API
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Icanhazip vs RSQ API: common questions
Which is more reliable, Icanhazip or RSQ API?
On our scheduled checks, RSQ API leads on measured uptime — Icanhazip at 26.5% versus RSQ API at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Icanhazip or RSQ API?
Icanhazip has the lower median latency in our checks — Icanhazip responds in 328 ms versus RSQ API at 783 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Icanhazip and RSQ API need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Icanhazip is callable with no signup, and RSQ API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Icanhazip and RSQ API from the browser?
Only Icanhazip is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. RSQ API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are Icanhazip and RSQ API free for commercial use?
Icanhazip has unclear commercial terms, and RSQ API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.