shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Icanhazip vs Random Profiles

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIIcanhazipNEW—Random ProfilesNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Icanhazip vs Random Profiles: common questions

Which is more reliable, Icanhazip or Random Profiles?

On our scheduled checks, Random Profiles leads on measured uptime — Icanhazip at —% versus Random Profiles at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Icanhazip and Random Profiles need an API key?

Icanhazip needs no key, while Random Profiles requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Icanhazip first.

Can I call Icanhazip and Random Profiles from the browser?

Yes — both Icanhazip and Random Profiles send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Icanhazip and Random Profiles free for commercial use?

Icanhazip has unclear commercial terms, and Random Profiles has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.