shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Icanhazip vs Logotypes

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIIcanhazipDEAD0LogotypesDEAD0
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d0.0%47.8%
Uptime · 30d0.0%0.0%
P50 · ms—3645
P95 · ms—4993
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Icanhazip vs Logotypes: common questions

Which is more reliable, Icanhazip or Logotypes?

On our scheduled checks, Logotypes leads on measured uptime — Icanhazip at 0.0% versus Logotypes at 47.8% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Icanhazip and Logotypes need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Icanhazip is callable with no signup, and Logotypes is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Icanhazip and Logotypes from the browser?

Only Icanhazip is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Logotypes needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Icanhazip and Logotypes free for commercial use?

Icanhazip has unclear commercial terms, and Logotypes has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.