shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Icanhazip vs Beeceptor

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIIcanhazipUNMONITORED—BeeceptorNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree public echo host, no signup
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Icanhazip vs Beeceptor: common questions

Which is more reliable, Icanhazip or Beeceptor?

Only Beeceptor is on our probe schedule so far (—% uptime over 90 days). The other is catalogued but not yet live-checked, so we can't compare measured reliability head-to-head — check the uncovered API's own status page for now.

Do Icanhazip and Beeceptor need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Icanhazip is callable with no signup, and Beeceptor is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Icanhazip and Beeceptor from the browser?

Yes — both Icanhazip and Beeceptor send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Icanhazip and Beeceptor free for commercial use?

Icanhazip has unclear commercial terms, and Beeceptor has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.