shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

icanhazdadjoke vs TasteDive

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIicanhazdadjokeNEW—TasteDiveNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limit100 req/window · 98 remaining · resets 1783513913Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

icanhazdadjoke vs TasteDive: common questions

Which is more reliable, icanhazdadjoke or TasteDive?

On our scheduled checks, TasteDive leads on measured uptime — icanhazdadjoke at —% versus TasteDive at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do icanhazdadjoke and TasteDive need an API key?

icanhazdadjoke needs no key, while TasteDive requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for icanhazdadjoke first.

Can I call icanhazdadjoke and TasteDive from the browser?

Only icanhazdadjoke is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. TasteDive needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are icanhazdadjoke and TasteDive free for commercial use?

icanhazdadjoke has unclear commercial terms, and TasteDive has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.