shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Huobi vs Trading View

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIHuobiHEALTHY96Trading ViewHEALTHY93
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms349511
P95 · ms10701648
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Huobi vs Trading View: common questions

Which is more reliable, Huobi or Trading View?

Both are neck-and-neck — Huobi and Trading View each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Huobi or Trading View?

Huobi has the lower median latency in our checks — Huobi responds in 349 ms versus Trading View at 511 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Huobi and Trading View need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — Huobi uses an API key and Trading View uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call Huobi and Trading View from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Huobi and Trading View from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Huobi and Trading View free for commercial use?

Huobi has unclear commercial terms, and Trading View has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.