Huobi vs Sharpe

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%98.0%
Uptime · 30d100%96.7%
P50 · ms3491239
P95 · ms10703358
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Huobi vs Sharpe: common questions

Which is more reliable, Huobi or Sharpe?

On our scheduled checks, Huobi leads on measured uptime — Huobi at 100% versus Sharpe at 98.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Huobi or Sharpe?

Huobi has the lower median latency in our checks — Huobi responds in 349 ms versus Sharpe at 1239 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Huobi and Sharpe need an API key?

Sharpe needs no key, while Huobi requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Sharpe first.

Can I call Huobi and Sharpe from the browser?

Only Sharpe is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Huobi needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Huobi and Sharpe free for commercial use?

Huobi has unclear commercial terms, and Sharpe has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.