Hunter vs YADG
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Hunter vs YADG: common questions
Which is more reliable, Hunter or YADG?
On our scheduled checks, Hunter leads on measured uptime — Hunter at 100% versus YADG at 2.9% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Hunter or YADG?
Hunter has the lower median latency in our checks — Hunter responds in 362 ms versus YADG at 1308 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Hunter and YADG need an API key?
Both ask you to authenticate — Hunter uses an API key and YADG uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.
Can I call Hunter and YADG from the browser?
Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Hunter and YADG from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.
Are Hunter and YADG free for commercial use?
Hunter has unclear commercial terms, and YADG has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.