shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Hunter vs SnapAPI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIHunterNEW—SnapAPINEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Hunter vs SnapAPI: common questions

Which is more reliable, Hunter or SnapAPI?

On our scheduled checks, SnapAPI leads on measured uptime — Hunter at —% versus SnapAPI at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Hunter and SnapAPI need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — Hunter uses an API key and SnapAPI uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call Hunter and SnapAPI from the browser?

Only SnapAPI is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Hunter needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Hunter and SnapAPI free for commercial use?

Hunter has unclear commercial terms, and SnapAPI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.