shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Hunter vs Sheetsu

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIHunterNEW—SheetsuNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublished90 req/window · 89 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Hunter vs Sheetsu: common questions

Which is more reliable, Hunter or Sheetsu?

On our scheduled checks, Sheetsu leads on measured uptime — Hunter at —% versus Sheetsu at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Hunter and Sheetsu need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — Hunter uses an API key and Sheetsu uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call Hunter and Sheetsu from the browser?

Only Sheetsu is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Hunter needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Hunter and Sheetsu free for commercial use?

Hunter has unclear commercial terms, and Sheetsu has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.