Hunter vs Postman Echo

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms362201
P95 · ms859815
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Hunter vs Postman Echo: common questions

Which is more reliable, Hunter or Postman Echo?

Both are neck-and-neck — Hunter and Postman Echo each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Hunter or Postman Echo?

Postman Echo has the lower median latency in our checks — Hunter responds in 362 ms versus Postman Echo at 201 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Hunter and Postman Echo need an API key?

Postman Echo needs no key, while Hunter requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Postman Echo first.

Can I call Hunter and Postman Echo from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Hunter and Postman Echo from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Hunter and Postman Echo free for commercial use?

Hunter has unclear commercial terms, and Postman Echo has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.