shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Hunter vs Logotypes

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIHunterHEALTHY96LogotypesHEALTHY70
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%82.4%
Uptime · 30d100%76.7%
P50 · ms3623861
P95 · ms8594993
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Hunter vs Logotypes: common questions

Which is more reliable, Hunter or Logotypes?

On our scheduled checks, Hunter leads on measured uptime — Hunter at 100% versus Logotypes at 82.4% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Hunter or Logotypes?

Hunter has the lower median latency in our checks — Hunter responds in 362 ms versus Logotypes at 3861 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Hunter and Logotypes need an API key?

Logotypes needs no key, while Hunter requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Logotypes first.

Can I call Hunter and Logotypes from the browser?

Only Logotypes is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Hunter needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Hunter and Logotypes free for commercial use?

Hunter has unclear commercial terms, and Logotypes has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.