Httpbingo vs SiteIntel

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms4111005
P95 · ms11033849
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Httpbingo vs SiteIntel: common questions

Which is more reliable, Httpbingo or SiteIntel?

Both are neck-and-neck — Httpbingo and SiteIntel each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Httpbingo or SiteIntel?

Httpbingo has the lower median latency in our checks — Httpbingo responds in 411 ms versus SiteIntel at 1005 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Httpbingo and SiteIntel need an API key?

Httpbingo needs no key, while SiteIntel requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Httpbingo first.

Can I call Httpbingo and SiteIntel from the browser?

Only Httpbingo is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. SiteIntel needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Httpbingo and SiteIntel free for commercial use?

Httpbingo has unclear commercial terms, and SiteIntel has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.