Httpbingo vs Logotypes

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%82.4%
Uptime · 30d100%76.7%
P50 · ms4113861
P95 · ms11034993
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Httpbingo vs Logotypes: common questions

Which is more reliable, Httpbingo or Logotypes?

On our scheduled checks, Httpbingo leads on measured uptime — Httpbingo at 100% versus Logotypes at 82.4% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Httpbingo or Logotypes?

Httpbingo has the lower median latency in our checks — Httpbingo responds in 411 ms versus Logotypes at 3861 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Httpbingo and Logotypes need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Httpbingo is callable with no signup, and Logotypes is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Httpbingo and Logotypes from the browser?

Yes — both Httpbingo and Logotypes send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Httpbingo and Logotypes free for commercial use?

Httpbingo has unclear commercial terms, and Logotypes has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.