shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Html2PDF vs Hunter

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIHtml2PDFNEW—HunterNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Html2PDF vs Hunter: common questions

Which is more reliable, Html2PDF or Hunter?

On our scheduled checks, Hunter leads on measured uptime — Html2PDF at —% versus Hunter at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Html2PDF and Hunter need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — Html2PDF uses an API key and Hunter uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call Html2PDF and Hunter from the browser?

Only Html2PDF is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Hunter needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Html2PDF and Hunter free for commercial use?

Html2PDF has unclear commercial terms, and Hunter has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.