HOL Registry Broker vs Zenodo

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms3861698
P95 · ms9134935
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished30 req/window · 29 remaining · resets 1783516620
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

HOL Registry Broker vs Zenodo: common questions

Which is more reliable, HOL Registry Broker or Zenodo?

Both are neck-and-neck — HOL Registry Broker and Zenodo each measure 99.02% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, HOL Registry Broker or Zenodo?

HOL Registry Broker has the lower median latency in our checks — HOL Registry Broker responds in 386 ms versus Zenodo at 1698 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do HOL Registry Broker and Zenodo need an API key?

Zenodo needs no key, while HOL Registry Broker requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Zenodo first.

Can I call HOL Registry Broker and Zenodo from the browser?

Only Zenodo is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. HOL Registry Broker needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are HOL Registry Broker and Zenodo free for commercial use?

HOL Registry Broker has unclear commercial terms, and Zenodo has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.