HOL Registry Broker vs Umeå Open Data
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
HOL Registry Broker vs Umeå Open Data: common questions
Which is more reliable, HOL Registry Broker or Umeå Open Data?
On our scheduled checks, HOL Registry Broker leads on measured uptime — HOL Registry Broker at 99.02% versus Umeå Open Data at 89.2% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, HOL Registry Broker or Umeå Open Data?
HOL Registry Broker has the lower median latency in our checks — HOL Registry Broker responds in 386 ms versus Umeå Open Data at 1445 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do HOL Registry Broker and Umeå Open Data need an API key?
Umeå Open Data needs no key, while HOL Registry Broker requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Umeå Open Data first.
Can I call HOL Registry Broker and Umeå Open Data from the browser?
Only Umeå Open Data is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. HOL Registry Broker needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are HOL Registry Broker and Umeå Open Data free for commercial use?
HOL Registry Broker has unclear commercial terms, and Umeå Open Data has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.