Himalayas vs Kickbox

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%100%
Uptime · 30d98.3%100%
P50 · ms263592
P95 · ms37833630
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — open disposable-address check
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Himalayas vs Kickbox: common questions

Which is more reliable, Himalayas or Kickbox?

On our scheduled checks, Kickbox leads on measured uptime — Himalayas at 99.02% versus Kickbox at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Himalayas or Kickbox?

Himalayas has the lower median latency in our checks — Himalayas responds in 263 ms versus Kickbox at 592 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Himalayas and Kickbox need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Himalayas is callable with no signup, and Kickbox is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Himalayas and Kickbox from the browser?

Only Kickbox is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Himalayas needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Himalayas and Kickbox free for commercial use?

Himalayas has unclear commercial terms, and Kickbox has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.