Himalayas vs Jobicy

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%99.02%
Uptime · 30d98.3%98.3%
P50 · ms263629
P95 · ms37832417
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Himalayas vs Jobicy: common questions

Which is more reliable, Himalayas or Jobicy?

Both are neck-and-neck — Himalayas and Jobicy each measure 99.02% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Himalayas or Jobicy?

Himalayas has the lower median latency in our checks — Himalayas responds in 263 ms versus Jobicy at 629 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Himalayas and Jobicy need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Himalayas is callable with no signup, and Jobicy is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Himalayas and Jobicy from the browser?

Only Jobicy is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Himalayas needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Himalayas and Jobicy free for commercial use?

Himalayas has unclear commercial terms, and Jobicy has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.