Harry Potter API vs Songlink / Odesli

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%17.6%
Uptime · 30d100%11.7%
P50 · ms2021338
P95 · ms8644665
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Harry Potter API vs Songlink / Odesli: common questions

Which is more reliable, Harry Potter API or Songlink / Odesli?

On our scheduled checks, Harry Potter API leads on measured uptime — Harry Potter API at 100% versus Songlink / Odesli at 17.6% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Harry Potter API or Songlink / Odesli?

Harry Potter API has the lower median latency in our checks — Harry Potter API responds in 202 ms versus Songlink / Odesli at 1338 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Harry Potter API and Songlink / Odesli need an API key?

Harry Potter API needs no key, while Songlink / Odesli requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Harry Potter API first.

Can I call Harry Potter API and Songlink / Odesli from the browser?

Only Harry Potter API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Songlink / Odesli needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Harry Potter API and Songlink / Odesli free for commercial use?

Harry Potter API has unclear commercial terms, and Songlink / Odesli has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.