shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Harry Potter API vs PHP-Noise

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIHarry Potter APIHEALTHY98PHP-NoiseHEALTHY88
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms202915
P95 · ms8641785
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Harry Potter API vs PHP-Noise: common questions

Which is more reliable, Harry Potter API or PHP-Noise?

Both are neck-and-neck — Harry Potter API and PHP-Noise each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Harry Potter API or PHP-Noise?

Harry Potter API has the lower median latency in our checks — Harry Potter API responds in 202 ms versus PHP-Noise at 915 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Harry Potter API and PHP-Noise need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Harry Potter API is callable with no signup, and PHP-Noise is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Harry Potter API and PHP-Noise from the browser?

Yes — both Harry Potter API and PHP-Noise send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Harry Potter API and PHP-Noise free for commercial use?

Harry Potter API has unclear commercial terms, and PHP-Noise has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.