GoldBean vs Open Science Framework

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%97.1%
Uptime · 30d100%95.0%
P50 · ms875952
P95 · ms33932111
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

GoldBean vs Open Science Framework: common questions

Which is more reliable, GoldBean or Open Science Framework?

On our scheduled checks, GoldBean leads on measured uptime — GoldBean at 100% versus Open Science Framework at 97.1% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, GoldBean or Open Science Framework?

GoldBean has the lower median latency in our checks — GoldBean responds in 875 ms versus Open Science Framework at 952 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do GoldBean and Open Science Framework need an API key?

Open Science Framework needs no key, while GoldBean requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Open Science Framework first.

Can I call GoldBean and Open Science Framework from the browser?

Only GoldBean is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Open Science Framework needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are GoldBean and Open Science Framework free for commercial use?

GoldBean has unclear commercial terms, and Open Science Framework has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.