Global Shark Attack API vs ScrapingDog

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.44%100%
Uptime · 30d98.3%100%
P50 · ms397127
P95 · ms1794526
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Global Shark Attack API vs ScrapingDog: common questions

Which is more reliable, Global Shark Attack API or ScrapingDog?

On our scheduled checks, ScrapingDog leads on measured uptime — Global Shark Attack API at 99.44% versus ScrapingDog at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Global Shark Attack API or ScrapingDog?

ScrapingDog has the lower median latency in our checks — Global Shark Attack API responds in 397 ms versus ScrapingDog at 127 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Global Shark Attack API and ScrapingDog need an API key?

Global Shark Attack API needs no key, while ScrapingDog requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Global Shark Attack API first.

Can I call Global Shark Attack API and ScrapingDog from the browser?

Yes — both Global Shark Attack API and ScrapingDog send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Global Shark Attack API and ScrapingDog free for commercial use?

Global Shark Attack API has unclear commercial terms, and ScrapingDog has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.