Global Shark Attack API vs PubMed E-utilities

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms
P95 · ms
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished3 req/window · 1 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Global Shark Attack API vs PubMed E-utilities: common questions

Which is more reliable, Global Shark Attack API or PubMed E-utilities?

On our scheduled checks, PubMed E-utilities leads on measured uptime — Global Shark Attack API at —% versus PubMed E-utilities at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Global Shark Attack API and PubMed E-utilities need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Global Shark Attack API is callable with no signup, and PubMed E-utilities is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Global Shark Attack API and PubMed E-utilities from the browser?

Yes — both Global Shark Attack API and PubMed E-utilities send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Global Shark Attack API and PubMed E-utilities free for commercial use?

Global Shark Attack API has unclear commercial terms, and PubMed E-utilities has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.