Gladia vs Wikipedia REST

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms120398
P95 · ms4121961
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearyes
Data licenseUnverifiedCC BY-SA 4.0
Free tierFree tier — API key may be required for productionUnlimited within etiquette
Rate limitUnpublished200/sec global courtesy cap
In directory since2026-07-052026-05-09
operationalpartialdownno data

Gladia vs Wikipedia REST: common questions

Which is more reliable, Gladia or Wikipedia REST?

Both are neck-and-neck — Gladia and Wikipedia REST each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Gladia or Wikipedia REST?

Wikipedia REST has the lower median latency in our checks — Gladia responds in 1203 ms versus Wikipedia REST at 98 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Gladia and Wikipedia REST need an API key?

Wikipedia REST needs no key, while Gladia requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Wikipedia REST first.

Can I call Gladia and Wikipedia REST from the browser?

Yes — both Gladia and Wikipedia REST send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Gladia and Wikipedia REST free for commercial use?

Gladia has unclear commercial terms, and Wikipedia REST allows commercial use on its free tier. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.