GitHub REST API vs WebScraping.AI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.44%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms349378
P95 · ms26711177
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

GitHub REST API vs WebScraping.AI: common questions

Which is more reliable, GitHub REST API or WebScraping.AI?

On our scheduled checks, WebScraping.AI leads on measured uptime — GitHub REST API at 99.44% versus WebScraping.AI at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, GitHub REST API or WebScraping.AI?

GitHub REST API has the lower median latency in our checks — GitHub REST API responds in 349 ms versus WebScraping.AI at 378 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do GitHub REST API and WebScraping.AI need an API key?

GitHub REST API needs no key, while WebScraping.AI requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for GitHub REST API first.

Can I call GitHub REST API and WebScraping.AI from the browser?

Only GitHub REST API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. WebScraping.AI needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are GitHub REST API and WebScraping.AI free for commercial use?

GitHub REST API has unclear commercial terms, and WebScraping.AI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.