GitHub Project Issues vs Icanhazip
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
GitHub Project Issues vs Icanhazip: common questions
Which is more reliable, GitHub Project Issues or Icanhazip?
On our scheduled checks, GitHub Project Issues leads on measured uptime — GitHub Project Issues at 99.02% versus Icanhazip at 26.5% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, GitHub Project Issues or Icanhazip?
Icanhazip has the lower median latency in our checks — GitHub Project Issues responds in 478 ms versus Icanhazip at 328 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do GitHub Project Issues and Icanhazip need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — GitHub Project Issues is callable with no signup, and Icanhazip is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call GitHub Project Issues and Icanhazip from the browser?
Only Icanhazip is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. GitHub Project Issues needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are GitHub Project Issues and Icanhazip free for commercial use?
GitHub Project Issues has unclear commercial terms, and Icanhazip has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.