shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

GitHub Contribution Chart Generator vs Wikipedia REST

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIGitHub Contribution Chart GeneratorNEW—Wikipedia RESTHEALTHY—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearyes
Data licenseUnverified (derived from public GitHub profile data)CC BY-SA 4.0
Free tierFree — no keyUnlimited within etiquette
Rate limitUnpublished200/sec global courtesy cap
In directory since2026-07-052026-05-09
operationalpartialdownno data

GitHub Contribution Chart Generator vs Wikipedia REST: common questions

Which is more reliable, GitHub Contribution Chart Generator or Wikipedia REST?

On our scheduled checks, Wikipedia REST leads on measured uptime — GitHub Contribution Chart Generator at —% versus Wikipedia REST at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do GitHub Contribution Chart Generator and Wikipedia REST need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — GitHub Contribution Chart Generator is callable with no signup, and Wikipedia REST is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call GitHub Contribution Chart Generator and Wikipedia REST from the browser?

Only Wikipedia REST is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. GitHub Contribution Chart Generator needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are GitHub Contribution Chart Generator and Wikipedia REST free for commercial use?

GitHub Contribution Chart Generator has unclear commercial terms, and Wikipedia REST allows commercial use on its free tier. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.