GitHub Contribution Chart Generator vs RuntimeBuzz Article API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms
P95 · ms
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified (derived from public GitHub profile data)Unverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

GitHub Contribution Chart Generator vs RuntimeBuzz Article API: common questions

Which is more reliable, GitHub Contribution Chart Generator or RuntimeBuzz Article API?

On our scheduled checks, RuntimeBuzz Article API leads on measured uptime — GitHub Contribution Chart Generator at —% versus RuntimeBuzz Article API at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do GitHub Contribution Chart Generator and RuntimeBuzz Article API need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — GitHub Contribution Chart Generator is callable with no signup, and RuntimeBuzz Article API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call GitHub Contribution Chart Generator and RuntimeBuzz Article API from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call GitHub Contribution Chart Generator and RuntimeBuzz Article API from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are GitHub Contribution Chart Generator and RuntimeBuzz Article API free for commercial use?

GitHub Contribution Chart Generator has unclear commercial terms, and RuntimeBuzz Article API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.