GitHub Contribution Chart Generator vs New York Times

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms
P95 · ms
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified (derived from public GitHub profile data)Unverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree tier — 500 requests/day
Rate limitUnpublished500 requests/day on free plan
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

GitHub Contribution Chart Generator vs New York Times: common questions

Which is more reliable, GitHub Contribution Chart Generator or New York Times?

On our scheduled checks, New York Times leads on measured uptime — GitHub Contribution Chart Generator at —% versus New York Times at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do GitHub Contribution Chart Generator and New York Times need an API key?

GitHub Contribution Chart Generator needs no key, while New York Times requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for GitHub Contribution Chart Generator first.

Can I call GitHub Contribution Chart Generator and New York Times from the browser?

Only New York Times is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. GitHub Contribution Chart Generator needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are GitHub Contribution Chart Generator and New York Times free for commercial use?

GitHub Contribution Chart Generator has unclear commercial terms, and New York Times has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.