GeoJS vs LatLng

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d98.9%59.4%
Uptime · 30d96.7%1.7%
P50 · ms62617
P95 · ms11372171
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree, no API key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished (no enforced limit stated)60 req/window · 59 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

GeoJS vs LatLng: common questions

Which is more reliable, GeoJS or LatLng?

On our scheduled checks, GeoJS leads on measured uptime — GeoJS at 98.9% versus LatLng at 59.4% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, GeoJS or LatLng?

GeoJS has the lower median latency in our checks — GeoJS responds in 62 ms versus LatLng at 617 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do GeoJS and LatLng need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — GeoJS is callable with no signup, and LatLng is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call GeoJS and LatLng from the browser?

Yes — both GeoJS and LatLng send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are GeoJS and LatLng free for commercial use?

GeoJS has unclear commercial terms, and LatLng has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.