Geocode.xyz vs LatLng

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%59.4%
Uptime · 30d100%1.7%
P50 · ms231617
P95 · ms6372171
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished60 req/window · 59 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Geocode.xyz vs LatLng: common questions

Which is more reliable, Geocode.xyz or LatLng?

On our scheduled checks, Geocode.xyz leads on measured uptime — Geocode.xyz at 100% versus LatLng at 59.4% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Geocode.xyz or LatLng?

Geocode.xyz has the lower median latency in our checks — Geocode.xyz responds in 231 ms versus LatLng at 617 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Geocode.xyz and LatLng need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Geocode.xyz is callable with no signup, and LatLng is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Geocode.xyz and LatLng from the browser?

Yes — both Geocode.xyz and LatLng send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Geocode.xyz and LatLng free for commercial use?

Geocode.xyz has unclear commercial terms, and LatLng has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.