GDBrowser vs Scryfall
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
GDBrowser vs Scryfall: common questions
Which is more reliable, GDBrowser or Scryfall?
On our scheduled checks, GDBrowser leads on measured uptime — GDBrowser at 99.02% versus Scryfall at 96.1% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, GDBrowser or Scryfall?
GDBrowser has the lower median latency in our checks — GDBrowser responds in 209 ms versus Scryfall at 470 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do GDBrowser and Scryfall need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — GDBrowser is callable with no signup, and Scryfall is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call GDBrowser and Scryfall from the browser?
Yes — both GDBrowser and Scryfall send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are GDBrowser and Scryfall free for commercial use?
GDBrowser has unclear commercial terms, and Scryfall has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.