GDBrowser vs Psychonauts API
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
GDBrowser vs Psychonauts API: common questions
Which is more reliable, GDBrowser or Psychonauts API?
On our scheduled checks, Psychonauts API leads on measured uptime — GDBrowser at 94.9% versus Psychonauts API at 98.9% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, GDBrowser or Psychonauts API?
GDBrowser has the lower median latency in our checks — GDBrowser responds in 153 ms versus Psychonauts API at 2855 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do GDBrowser and Psychonauts API need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — GDBrowser is callable with no signup, and Psychonauts API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call GDBrowser and Psychonauts API from the browser?
Only GDBrowser is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Psychonauts API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are GDBrowser and Psychonauts API free for commercial use?
GDBrowser has unclear commercial terms, and Psychonauts API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.